The PR Friendly Index for August 2008
Once again it’s been a bit longer than a month since last I compiled this. But at least I managed it eventually.
Key below, index below that, explanation below that.
You might also find the FAQ useful.
| KEY | |||
|
|
Technorati Authority – unique incoming blog links over the past six months | ||
|
|
Technorati Inlinks – total incoming blog links over the past six months | ||
|
|
Yahoo Inlinks – incoming web links, not including links within that site | ||
|
|
HowSociable Score – social media score calculated by HowSociable.com | ||
|
|
Google Blog Hits – Google blog search hits | ||
|
|
Google Blog Hits over the past Month – Google blog search hits over the past month | ||
|
|
IceRocket – recent posts that link to a site according to IceRocket | ||
|
|
||||
| 1 | 0 Micro Persuasion | 1,858 |
|
|
| 3,667 |
|
|||
| 487,660 |
|
|||
| 60 |
|
|||
| 224 |
|
|||
| 223 |
|
|||
| 1,814 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 2 | 0 Online Marketing Blog | 1,964 |
|
|
| 3,890 |
|
|||
| 150,016 |
|
|||
| 33 |
|
|||
| 218 |
|
|||
| 215 |
|
|||
| 1,358 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 3 | 0 PR 2.0 Silicon Valley | 954 |
|
|
| 1,768 |
|
|||
| 82,493 |
|
|||
| 41 |
|
|||
| 243 |
|
|||
| 243 |
|
|||
| 1,054 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 4 | 0 PR Watch | 590 |
|
|
| 2,059 |
|
|||
| 318,346 |
|
|||
| 25 |
|
|||
| 126 |
|
|||
| 122 |
|
|||
| 526 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 5 | 0 PR Squared | 598 |
|
|
| 513 |
|
|||
| 68,499 |
|
|||
| 22 |
|
|||
| 153 |
|
|||
| 147 |
|
|||
| 639 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 6 | 0 a shel of my former self | 410 |
|
|
| 724 |
|
|||
| 97,052 |
|
|||
| 22 |
|
|||
| 87 |
|
|||
| 87 |
|
|||
| 506 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 7 | 0 NevilleHobson.com | 331 |
|
|
| 661 |
|
|||
| 95,297 |
|
|||
| 19 |
|
|||
| 149 |
|
|||
| 143 |
|
|||
| 384 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 8 | +1 The Buzz Bin | 387 |
|
|
| 815 |
|
|||
| 44,714 |
|
|||
| 19 |
|
|||
| 40 |
|
|||
| 40 |
|
|||
| 627 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 9 | +1 Communication Overtones | 282 |
|
|
| 578 |
|
|||
| 41,795 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
| 58 |
|
|||
| 58 |
|
|||
| 358 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 10 | -3 Web Ink Now | 588 |
|
|
| 1,008 |
|
|||
| 63,283 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
| 137 |
|
|||
| 136 |
|
|||
| 630 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 11 | 0 Pop! PR Jots | 198 |
|
|
| 286 |
|
|||
| 49,967 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 52 |
|
|||
| 52 |
|
|||
| 185 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 12 | +4 PR Blogger | 167 |
|
|
| 293 |
|
|||
| 38,671 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 34 |
|
|||
| 34 |
|
|||
| 126 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 13 | +1 The Bad Pitch Blog | 201 |
|
|
| 317 |
|
|||
| 42,347 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 53 |
|
|||
| 53 |
|
|||
| 167 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 14 | +12 Fleet Street PR | 165 |
|
|
| 349 |
|
|||
| 5,088 |
|
|||
| 42 |
|
|||
| 42 |
|
|||
| 42 |
|
|||
| 197 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 15 | 0 Media Orchard | 93 |
|
|
| 309 |
|
|||
| 43,920 |
|
|||
| 10 |
|
|||
| 57 |
|
|||
| 57 |
|
|||
| 103 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 16 | -4 Canuckflack | 238 |
|
|
| 280 |
|
|||
| 10,870 |
|
|||
| 29 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 264 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 17 | +4 Strategic Public Relations | 156 |
|
|
| 219 |
|
|||
| 32,867 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 26 |
|
|||
| 26 |
|
|||
| 105 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 18 | +2 Spinwatch | 107 |
|
|
| 235 |
|
|||
| 96,147 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
| 37 |
|
|||
| 36 |
|
|||
| 95 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 19 | +6 A PR Guy’s Musings | 96 |
|
|
| 213 |
|
|||
| 30,614 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 113 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 20 | -1 Pro PR | 138 |
|
|
| 341 |
|
|||
| 27,076 |
|
|||
| 19 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 199 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 21 | +3 PR Communications | 121 |
|
|
| 221 |
|
|||
| 12,392 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
| 110 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 22 | -1 Young PR | 140 |
|
|
| 191 |
|
|||
| 19,764 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 133 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 23 | +7 CustomScoop’s PR Blog Jots | 133 |
|
|
| 200 |
|
|||
| 3,090 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 17 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
| 176 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 24 | +10 PR Newser | 134 |
|
|
| 289 |
|
|||
| 4,217 |
|
|||
| 21 |
|
|||
| 13 |
|
|||
| 13 |
|
|||
| 111 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 25 | +16 Murphy’s Law | 69 |
|
|
| 101 |
|
|||
| 23,388 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 51 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 26 | +17 Peter Shankman | 219 |
|
|
| 347 |
|
|||
| 1,578 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 189 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 27 | -9 PR Works | 84 |
|
|
| 139 |
|
|||
| 17,273 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 23 |
|
|||
| 23 |
|
|||
| 103 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 28 | +16 Brendan Cooper | 95 |
|
|
| 162 |
|
|||
| 7,748 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
| 75 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 29 | -6 Strumpette | 90 |
|
|
| 122 |
|
|||
| 10,713 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 13 |
|
|||
| 78 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 30 | -17 Flack Life | 236 |
|
|
| 342 |
|
|||
| 19,096 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 13 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 266 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 31 | +19 Wadds’ tech pr blog | 81 |
|
|
| 135 |
|
|||
| 13,458 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 34 |
|
|||
| 34 |
|
|||
| 69 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 32 | -15 Todd Andrlik | 354 |
|
|
| 659 |
|
|||
| 12,174 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 450 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 33 | +3 ToughSledding | 65 |
|
|
| 114 |
|
|||
| 18,260 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 17 |
|
|||
| 17 |
|
|||
| 67 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 34 | -5 Paul Gillin – Social Media | 103 |
|
|
| 140 |
|
|||
| 32,872 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 91 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 35 | -4 The Flack | 83 |
|
|
| 127 |
|
|||
| 67,710 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 31 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 67 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 36 | +12 KDPaine’s PR Measurement | 70 |
|
|
| 110 |
|
|||
| 8,047 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 65 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 37 | -9 Common Sense PR | 138 |
|
|
| 692 |
|
|||
| 4,973 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
| 159 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 38 | +8 Wired PR Works | 83 |
|
|
| 148 |
|
|||
| 2,674 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 25 |
|
|||
| 23 |
|
|||
| 82 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 39 | -6 Occam’s RazR | 78 |
|
|
| 160 |
|
|||
| 9,354 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 91 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 42 | +15 Heather Yaxley | 57 |
|
|
| 100 |
|
|||
| 16,784 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 32 |
|
|||
| 32 |
|
|||
| 45 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 42 | -5 Naked PR | 79 |
|
|
| 115 |
|
|||
| 15,283 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 70 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 42 | +16 Drew B’s take on tech PR | 63 |
|
|
| 82 |
|
|||
| 21,354 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
| 29 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 43 | +8 Getting Ink | 96 |
|
|
| 182 |
|
|||
| 2,421 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 22 |
|
|||
| 22 |
|
|||
| 88 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 44 | -5 PR Conversations | 59 |
|
|
| 116 |
|
|||
| 17,673 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 54 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 45 | +14 Beyond PR | 39 |
|
|
| 107 |
|
|||
| 15,186 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 20 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 35 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 46 | -9 Cooler Insights | 41 |
|
|
| 98 |
|
|||
| 17,521 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 59 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 47 | +7 PR Studies | 54 |
|
|
| 111 |
|
|||
| 21,689 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 39 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 49 | New Socialized PR | 84 |
|
|
| 119 |
|
|||
| 1,320 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 60 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 49 | -22 Tech PR Gems | 78 |
|
|
| 187 |
|
|||
| 7,181 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 147 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 50 | -5 Piaras Kelly PR | 45 |
|
|
| 66 |
|
|||
| 23,396 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 46 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 51 | +4 Simonsays | 62 |
|
|
| 87 |
|
|||
| 17,312 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 50 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 52 | -5 Valley PR Blog | 50 |
|
|
| 106 |
|
|||
| 7,939 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 47 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 53 | -21 PR Meets the WWW | 53 |
|
|
| 69 |
|
|||
| 35,646 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 30 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 54 | +13 bitemarks | 39 |
|
|
| 56 |
|
|||
| 10,701 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 24 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 55 | -13 IndiaPRBlog! | 39 |
|
|
| 89 |
|
|||
| 9,303 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 60 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 56 | -21 Blogging Me, Blogging You | 52 |
|
|
| 73 |
|
|||
| 17,825 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 10 |
|
|||
| 46 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 57 | +14 In Front of Your Nose | 36 |
|
|
| 69 |
|
|||
| 4,220 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
| 32 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 58 | -18 Corporate PR | 49 |
|
|
| 81 |
|
|||
| 24,163 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 24 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 59 | +1 Engage in PR | 36 |
|
|
| 62 |
|
|||
| 7,227 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 49 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 61 | -12 PR Meets Marketing | 65 |
|
|
| 101 |
|
|||
| 1,700 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 99 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 61 | +2 The New PR | 36 |
|
|
| 49 |
|
|||
| 8,055 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
| 30 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 62 | New From PR to Eternity | 32 |
|
|
| 71 |
|
|||
| 380 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 28 |
|
|||
| 28 |
|
|||
| 27 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 63 | New Observations of PR | 44 |
|
|
| 53 |
|
|||
| 10,467 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 31 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 64 | -12 PR Disasters | 48 |
|
|
| 88 |
|
|||
| 7,934 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 49 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 65 | 0 The Rosemont Loving | 19 |
|
|
| 28 |
|
|||
| 11,405 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 66 | +13 All Things PR | 26 |
|
|
| 48 |
|
|||
| 3,782 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 24 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 67 | -5 The New Marketing | 53 |
|
|
| 53 |
|
|||
| 743 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 30 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 69 | -3 my(PR)palette | 26 |
|
|
| 57 |
|
|||
| 961 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 13 |
|
|||
| 13 |
|
|||
| 28 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 69 | -13 Teaching PR | 46 |
|
|
| 77 |
|
|||
| 6,413 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 49 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 70 | -6 The PR 2.0 Universe | 30 |
|
|
| 89 |
|
|||
| 7,145 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 20 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 71 | -18 Strive Notes | 35 |
|
|
| 67 |
|
|||
| 3,909 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 36 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 72 | +2 Priscilla’s World | 16 |
|
|
| 31 |
|
|||
| 4,571 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 73 | New PR Media Blog | 34 |
|
|
| 50 |
|
|||
| 1,654 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 19 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 74 | +6 Don’t eat the shrimp | 18 |
|
|
| 36 |
|
|||
| 1,772 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 17 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 75 | +2 Glass House | 12 |
|
|
| 18 |
|
|||
| 9,777 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
| 12 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 76 | New Beyond the Hype | 3 |
|
|
| 59 |
|
|||
| 846 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 77 | -2 Alan Weinkrantz PR | 17 |
|
|
| 41 |
|
|||
| 2,815 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 78 | -6 media mindshare | 25 |
|
|
| 37 |
|
|||
| 6,695 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 2 |
|
|||
| 15 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 80 | New Flacks Revenge | 23 |
|
|
| 44 |
|
|||
| 1,250 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 37 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 80 | +5 Point oh | 18 |
|
|
| 30 |
|
|||
| 281 |
|
|||
| 21 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 81 | -13 Media Guerrilla | 10 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
|||
| 7,437 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 14 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 82 | +1 Fusion PR Forum | 13 |
|
|
| 29 |
|
|||
| 774 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
| 18 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 83 | -13 PR Girlz | 22 |
|
|
| 24 |
|
|||
| 5,078 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 21 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 84 | +5 PR-otagonism | 22 |
|
|
| 41 |
|
|||
| 1,361 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
| 16 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 85 | -16 Tech PR War Stories | 26 |
|
|
| 53 |
|
|||
| 1,424 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 24 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 86 | +6 PR Voice | 34 |
|
|
| 68 |
|
|||
| 1,346 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 87 | +7 Corporati | 12 |
|
|
| 24 |
|
|||
| 5,594 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 89 | -4 nerd-in-residence | 11 |
|
|
| 20 |
|
|||
| 472 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 9 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 89 | +9 Change and internal communications | 8 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
|||
| 3,536 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 90 | -17 PR 2.0 | 20 |
|
|
| 32 |
|
|||
| 6,861 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 91 | -10 wordymouth | 17 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
|||
| 541 |
|
|||
| 5 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 11 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 92 | -2 Public Relations Rogue | 12 |
|
|
| 22 |
|
|||
| 1,706 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 94 | -1 Small Business PR/Marketing | 21 |
|
|
| 28 |
|
|||
| 176 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 94 | -16 The PR Place | 7 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
|||
| 3,057 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 95 | -11 GREENblog | 6 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
|||
| 3,632 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 96 | -1 DummySpit | 9 |
|
|
| 16 |
|
|||
| 2,127 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 4 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 97 | -16 First Person PR | 11 |
|
|
| 17 |
|
|||
| 1,205 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 7 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 98 | -10 Media Artifacts | 4 |
|
|
| 10 |
|
|||
| 311 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 8 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 99 | -12 note to editors… | 5 |
|
|
| 12 |
|
|||
| 1,513 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 6 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
| 100 | -9 The last man in Europe… | 2 |
|
|
| 6 |
|
|||
| 681 |
|
|||
| 1 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 0 |
|
|||
| 3 |
|
|||
|
|
||||
Once again I’ve left it quite a while since the last index, so there are some new entries: Socialized PR, Flacks Revenge, PR Media Blog, From PR to Eternity, Beyond the Hype and Observations of PR.
This means I’ve had to drop some other blogs, which have either sunk, been untouched for ages, or don’t quite fit here any more. They are PR In A Jar, Point Being, Indian and Global PR, Tech for PR, Wagner Comms, and Onalytica. The last one I feel a bit sad about because I’m a big fan of what Onalytica do, but I haven’t seen much PR discussion on the blog for a while. I may revisit this decision.
The other main change is that I’ve dropped Google. This is purely because Google has done something to its search results layout which means I can’t use Google Docs’s own ImportHTML function to bring that data in!
Fortunately this gave me the opportunity to use my Easybee software on a newcomer to the social media measurement world: HowSociable.com.
HowSociable is an intriguing prospect. It grabs metrics from 22 social sources such as Flickr, Twitter, Technorati and so on, then calculates a ‘score’ based on a brand’s performance across all these sources.
There are drawbacks (naturally – aren’t there always?). Firstly, given that it doesn’t class a ‘brand’ as a URL, and doesn’t allow forward-slashes, I’ve had to take educated guesses on blogs that are subdomains, so for example with a URL like http://blogs.hillandknowlton.com/blogs/davidferrabee/default.aspx I’ve had to take the ‘davidferrabee’ as the HowSociable search term. So I’ve tried to compare like for like, but I cannot be absolutely certain I’m being fair across the board.
Also, we don’t know how it calculates its score. I suppose this doesn’t matter if it’s consistent, but with such a new site I do wonder how much it will change over the coming months. It already experienced some downtime recently, and I have a feeling it compiles its figures through scraping. So all it takes is for the target sites to get wise, change their formats slightly, and HowSociable is comprised. So let’s hope the people behind HowSociable are clever enough to develop the site to the point it becomes a useful and trusted source of measurement for people like me.
Because it’s been an interesting inclusion. While it doesn’t seem to have hugely affected the rankings, there are some very noticeable spikes lower down the table. For example Dave Fleet has a very high HowSociable score (I just checked – davefleet.com is now at 46 so it’s even higher), and I assume this is down to his Twitter omnipresence. I would say this is the case for the other lower-ranking bloggers too – that is, they may wield more influence as social media-ites rather than purely as bloggers.
One quite alarming observation this month is that the Google Blog figures are screwy. The figures over the past month are virtually identical to the figures from any period. This implies to me that either Google’s having a bad time, or they’ve deliberately wiped some data and their records are counting again. I’ve seen only one mention of the Google Blog data issue so either it’s not an issue, or I’m wrong, or maybe Google are just hoping no one notices. I do wonder whether this is related to the recent problems with GMail and Feedburner.
In fact, these results were so plain daft that I was considering not even compiling the index. But I figured that, if Google really have reset the figures, then I could be waiting for quite some time before they started becoming meaningful again. I could remove them altogether in future.
Technorati was also a bit flakey this month. I just couldn’t obtain inlinks figures for some sites so I averaged out the inlinks-to-reactions ratio for the other sites – it comes to about 2.14 – and calculated substitute scores for them.
So, there you have it. All comments/questions/suggestions welcome.
[...] out Brendan’s blog for all 100 top PR blogs and an explanation of the how the rankings were [...]
Thanks for the heads-up on HowSociable. I do wonder, though, if that boosts people like Dave who have a URL branded under his name at the expense of people like me. I have ikepigott all over the place, and it is typically associated with Occam’s RazR as far as humans are concerned. Don’t know if the machine picks that up….
I also didn’t know about How Sociable, so I have learned something today. When I searched for kamichat, which is my nom de plume across the social networks, my score was 42. Also, if you spell out the whole blog name “Communication Overtones” (vs. overtonecomm) it gets a score of 37 (vs. 15).
All very interesting. I am looking forward to playing with that tool a little more.
Kami
OK, the rules I have adopted for HowSociable regarding URLs are:
* If the blog has its own domain, I use that. So, for http://www.micropersuasion.com I look for ‘www.micropersuasion.com’; for http://brendancooper.com, I look up ‘brendancooper.com’
* This also applies if it has a blogging platform domain. So, for http://armourpr.wordpress.com/ I look up armourpr.wordpress.com; for http://topazpartners.blogspot.com/
I look up topazpartners.blogspot.com
* If a blog is in a subdomain, I have to make an educated guess as to which bit to use. So for http://simoncollister.typepad.com/simonsays/, I’ve looked up simoncollister.typepad.com; for http://kdpaine.blogs.com/kdpaines_pr_m/ I’ve looked up kdpaine.blogs.com.
Ike, this means I’m looking up occamsrazr.com for you, and Kami, for you it’s overtonecomm.blogspot.com.
I know what you’re saying about looking up names that are closer to your ‘real’ names or your ‘web’ names. But there are difficult decisions to be made here. For example, for greenbanana.wordpress.com, should that be a search for Heather Yaxley instead? What about PRNewser, because that’s a group of people? Same with TechPR War Stories, that’s David Strom and Paul Gillin. So do I then search for their names and add their HowSociable scores together?
Then what about names that might have frequent hits but for the wrong person? Media Guerrilla is in fact Mike Manuel, but type that name into Google and you get http://mikemanuel.com/ who seems to be a Country & Western singer!
So, you see, the question of what constitutes a ‘brand name’ is itself riddled with difficulties. This is why I deliberately chose to go with something that would be as close to unique as possible – the blog URL – and that would deviate as little and be as objective as possible – again, the blog URL.
Or how about I go with the blog names instead? In which case, how would I deal with blog names such as ‘PR 2.0′ or ‘Change and internal communications’ which are so generic they’d get all sorts of unrelated hits?
I’m glad you’ve both raised this however. I thought long and hard before including it, and I should probably have explained my reasoning more carefully in the original post. I’m open to suggestions for how to improve this approach.
Hi Brendan, You’ve actually got my old blog linked here — which is probably OK because http://www.teachingpr.org hasn’t caught up with it yet, so I’m better off in the rankings with the old one. Sad, I know.
Hi Karen, thanks for the heads-up, duly noted for next time around…
Hope you get lots of traffic from this post, Brendan!
You certainly deserve lots of attention for your efforts – the PR Friendly Index is a truly unique scoring system that keeps evolving.
Appreciate the introduction to How Social – fun to play around with my multiple online personas and see how each measures up.
@wiredprworks on twitter.com
Lists are always fun and tough for the list maker. So many things to consider.
RE: Yahoo Inlinks, I noticed you’ve used the home page, not the entire blog for link counts. Of course as blogs, people link to individual posts as much or more than the home page. It’s a sign of quality content.
Here’s an interesting comparison:
micropersuasion home page links: 512,766
micropersuasion site links: 646,579
toprankblog home page links: 148,905
toprankblog site links: 666,577
When you use a measure of inbound links to an entire blog, then toprankblog actually has more inbound links than micropersuasion.
By pointing this out I am not suggesting a change to your methodology because if you were limited to checking links to an entire site, it would not be possible to distinguish links for blogs hosted on 3rd party platforms like blogspot.com, wordpress.com, typepad.com etc. That is a limitation of the Yahoo Site Explorer tool.
Thank you by the way, for including Online Marketing Blog in the consideration set. There are many great PR blogs in this list.
Thanks, Brendan. BTW, for your stats purposes, we changed the main URL of the Buzz Bin to http://www.livingstonbuzz.com. /blog/ is no longer sourced for inbound links to individual posts. Best wishes.
Wow, I leave my blog alone for a day and come back to so many great comments!
@Lee, very interesting point. But wouldn’t inlinks throughout the entire blog also be ‘muddied’ by the amount of internal linking done within the blog? That is, if I were to link very often to my own previous posts then I would get a higher inlink score? In fact, the recent addition of automatically generated ‘Possibly related posts’ on WordPress could be doing this too.
I will think on that one.
@Geoff – thanks, noted for next time around.
@Barbara – thank you! Actually I can reveal that this has been my single most popular post ever with approaching 900 views so far, and by far the most links coming from PR Newser.
[...] recent post shows this blog declining in activities, (currently at spot 39, declining at -20… ) but an increase in “sociability” This just means, I still “socialised” [...]
[...] Cooper of Feishman-Hillard London has put together an index ranking PR blogs based inbound links, blog search hits and HowSociable scores. While the system Cooper uses to [...]
[...] – bookmarked by 5 members originally found by antiacido on 2008-11-12 The PR Friendly Index for August 2008 http://brendancooper.com/2008/08/19/the-pr-friendly-index-for-august-2008/ – bookmarked by 2 [...]