About the Post

Author Information

Brendan Cooper is a digital and social media strategist. He helps clients win business, win awards and talk to people through digital and social media strategy. Brendan has been helping people to communicate, online and offline, for over fifteen years. He is friendly, and he likes to live in bubbles, be they dotcom, social media, or whatever's coming up next.

It’s King Kong vs Godzilla

Today, a fantastic battle of egos: the Scobleizer vs the Guru.

First, usability expert (let’s forget guru) Jakob Nielsen issues a seemingly innocuous article – note, doesn’t ‘post’ – about how shallow blog postings really add no value, particularly in B2B comms. Nielsen doesn’t run a blog. Someone else does it for him, kind of.

Then, a retort (can you retort to something that isn’t directed at you?). Robert Scoble, aka ‘Scobleizer’ (or, in Brit, Scobleiser), has a bit of a hissy fit claiming Nielsen’s article contains a lot of ‘gestures’, allegedly at him.

I find it interesting that essentially they’re writing about two different things. We could talk Long Tail here and say that Nielsen is referring to the head of the tail, that is, the ‘hits’ generally produced by pros. Scoble is firmly in the tail camp, that is, issuing short, sharp insights into social media that is much more the ‘amateur’ domain but contains some hits too (his being one).

As is always the case, the truth probably lies somewhere in between. Nielsen is right that you need to add value with real research and real insight: that’s probably closer to online journalism than blogging. Scoble is right in that you lose a lot of interactivity and immediacy by doing so.

However I think Scoble has the upper hand here. You can see it quite plainly by looking at the two links. Nielsen’s page, not being a blog, therefore doesn’t invite discussion – meaning refutation, rebuttal, affirmation and general comment. Scoble’s does, and contains all of those things and more. What is more interesting, single, one-off expert opinion or broadly informed mass debate? An event, or a process? I’d plumb for the process every time.

If you value both, you’re in the neck of the long tail. As I said, the truth lies somewhere in between.

Technorati tag: Track co.mmentsSubscribe to this feedSubscribe by email

BlinkList | Blogmarks | Digg | Del.icio.us | Ekstreme Socializer | Feedmarker | Furl | Google Bookmarks | ma.gnolia | Netvouz | New PR | RawSugar | Reddit | Scuttle | Shadows | Simpy | Spurl | Technorati | Unalog | Wink | Yahoo MyWeb2

Advertisement

3 Comments on “It’s King Kong vs Godzilla”

  1. Kerry G July 11, 2007 at 2:18 pm #

    Hmm, as Scoble’s post made me want to make the international sign of “handbags” I don’t think he has the upper hand. He seems to have missed the point rather and surely he should understand that in an infinite internet there is room for both approaches, which will both be equally wrong or right to use at different times.

  2. Touché? July 11, 2007 at 6:27 pm #

    Haven’t you all got anything better to talk about?

  3. The Friendly Ghost July 11, 2007 at 6:33 pm #

    Well I doubt this is Jeremy Paxman. However, on the offchance it is, I once saw you on a London Tube platform and your trenchcoat was far too tightly belted and your head was huge. So there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.