<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Friendly Ghost PowerPR Index: The top 70 (or so) PR blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/</link>
	<description>Digital, social media, and everything in between from someone who likes to live in bubbles, be they dotcom, social media, or whatever&#039;s next...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 06:02:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friendly Ghost</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Friendly Ghost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love compiling lists. I&#039;m probably deeply autistic but, critically, lack the self-awareness to see this. It&#039;s probably a distinct drawback in a communications industry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love compiling lists. I&#8217;m probably deeply autistic but, critically, lack the self-awareness to see this. It&#8217;s probably a distinct drawback in a communications industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Jones</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love being on lists.  This one at least doesn&#039;t have my picture and isn&#039;t likely to be hung in the post office.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love being on lists.  This one at least doesn&#8217;t have my picture and isn&#8217;t likely to be hung in the post office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friendly Ghost</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Friendly Ghost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 15:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, check out http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/the-friendly-ghost-powerpr-index-take-two/ - this might unruffle some feathers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, check out <a href="http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/the-friendly-ghost-powerpr-index-take-two/" rel="nofollow">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/10/the-friendly-ghost-powerpr-index-take-two/</a> &#8211; this might unruffle some feathers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friendly Ghost</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Friendly Ghost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the warning Scott. :)

In the interests of open, real-time, unedited dialogue, here&#039;s the story so far. I&#039;ve replicated the bloglines section - and there are some very strange discrepancies between what I see when I look at blogines subscriptions, and what the Power150 must see. There are quite a few sites that list very low subscription scores, and yet they score quite highly on the Power150. By &#039;subscription rates&#039;, I mean going to the site, clicking the Bloglines sub button, and counting up the subs on the feeds listed.

Because of this, I&#039;m minded to remove the bloglines section altogether until I get clarification. When I do remove the bloglines scoring, the table starts to make more sense.
I&#039;ve emailed the author to see if I can get insight into what&#039;s going on. 

I don&#039;t think this is a problem because I&#039;m still using Alexa, which could just substitite for the bloglines data.

I am currently looking into the Technorati rankings and hope to get this sorted soon. I&#039;m still confident that this will account for any more discrepancies, simply because the Technorati figure on the Power150 is given more weight, with a value up to 30. I find this oddddddd, but I&#039;m prepared to go with it for the sake of comparison.

The big question I guess is: should FG have verified all this before publishing? Well, I kind of did: I was able to rebuild the &#039;top 25 bloggers about blogging&#039; table accurately, and this was what I took as my methodology. But it seems that on looking deeper into this to simulate the Power150, something strange is happening with bloglines, and that, for the purposes of comparison, I should be closer to the Power150 for Technorati scores.

So this is being worked on right now. I&#039;m removing bloglines, revamping Technorati, but keeping Alexa.

So, keep your claws retracted PR people! I&#039;m on the case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the warning Scott. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In the interests of open, real-time, unedited dialogue, here&#8217;s the story so far. I&#8217;ve replicated the bloglines section &#8211; and there are some very strange discrepancies between what I see when I look at blogines subscriptions, and what the Power150 must see. There are quite a few sites that list very low subscription scores, and yet they score quite highly on the Power150. By &#8216;subscription rates&#8217;, I mean going to the site, clicking the Bloglines sub button, and counting up the subs on the feeds listed.</p>
<p>Because of this, I&#8217;m minded to remove the bloglines section altogether until I get clarification. When I do remove the bloglines scoring, the table starts to make more sense.<br />
I&#8217;ve emailed the author to see if I can get insight into what&#8217;s going on. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a problem because I&#8217;m still using Alexa, which could just substitite for the bloglines data.</p>
<p>I am currently looking into the Technorati rankings and hope to get this sorted soon. I&#8217;m still confident that this will account for any more discrepancies, simply because the Technorati figure on the Power150 is given more weight, with a value up to 30. I find this oddddddd, but I&#8217;m prepared to go with it for the sake of comparison.</p>
<p>The big question I guess is: should FG have verified all this before publishing? Well, I kind of did: I was able to rebuild the &#8216;top 25 bloggers about blogging&#8217; table accurately, and this was what I took as my methodology. But it seems that on looking deeper into this to simulate the Power150, something strange is happening with bloglines, and that, for the purposes of comparison, I should be closer to the Power150 for Technorati scores.</p>
<p>So this is being worked on right now. I&#8217;m removing bloglines, revamping Technorati, but keeping Alexa.</p>
<p>So, keep your claws retracted PR people! I&#8217;m on the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott baradell</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott baradell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 12:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch out, Ghost -- when you start talking about rankings, PR people will get their claws out. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch out, Ghost &#8212; when you start talking about rankings, PR people will get their claws out. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friendly Ghost</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-272</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Friendly Ghost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I also just noticed, Todd doesn&#039;t use Alexa, which would also influence these results.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also just noticed, Todd doesn&#8217;t use Alexa, which would also influence these results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Friendly Ghost</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Friendly Ghost]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amanda, I have double-checked the bloglines subscriptions for Strumpette. It seems you have two feeds - http://strumpette.com/feeds/index.rss2 and http://strumpette.com/feeds/atom.xml - and according to bloglines, neither of them have public subscribers, hence your figure here is zero. I&#039;m more than happy to change this if I&#039;m in error, but I&#039;ll need you to direct me to the right figure. EDIT: I have just done this again using the bloglines &#039;subscribe&#039; button and it is listing more feeds. Why bloglines is behaving differently this time, I do not know.
Regarding the divergence, I have just been through the PR sites on Todd&#039;s list and whereas there is some correlation I do take your point that there are also differences. I think this comes about because Todd And applies different weights, with bloglines from 1 to 20, Technorati from 1 to 30, and the mysterious &#039;Todd And&#039; factor that he throws in. I took the approach given by the Top 25 Blogs because I felt it was easier to quantify if each parameter was out of ten.
However, on reflection, I can see that it might make more sense to have directly comparable figures in this case, simply because there is overlap between the two lists. Whether or not I agree that bloglines and technorati should be given more weight, perhaps I should look into simulating Todd&#039;s approach instead.
I guess this just shows the difficulty not just in defining influence, but in obtaining directly comparable figures even for popularity.
So, I&#039;m going to look into this today. I&#039;ll reconstruct the Todd And table just to make sure I&#039;m following the same principles, and see how that affects the table (although I can&#039;t add the &#039;Todd And&#039; factor unfortunately).
Thanks,
FG
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda, I have double-checked the bloglines subscriptions for Strumpette. It seems you have two feeds &#8211; <a href="http://strumpette.com/feeds/index.rss2" rel="nofollow">http://strumpette.com/feeds/index.rss2</a> and <a href="http://strumpette.com/feeds/atom.xml" rel="nofollow">http://strumpette.com/feeds/atom.xml</a> &#8211; and according to bloglines, neither of them have public subscribers, hence your figure here is zero. I&#8217;m more than happy to change this if I&#8217;m in error, but I&#8217;ll need you to direct me to the right figure. EDIT: I have just done this again using the bloglines &#8216;subscribe&#8217; button and it is listing more feeds. Why bloglines is behaving differently this time, I do not know.<br />
Regarding the divergence, I have just been through the PR sites on Todd&#8217;s list and whereas there is some correlation I do take your point that there are also differences. I think this comes about because Todd And applies different weights, with bloglines from 1 to 20, Technorati from 1 to 30, and the mysterious &#8216;Todd And&#8217; factor that he throws in. I took the approach given by the Top 25 Blogs because I felt it was easier to quantify if each parameter was out of ten.<br />
However, on reflection, I can see that it might make more sense to have directly comparable figures in this case, simply because there is overlap between the two lists. Whether or not I agree that bloglines and technorati should be given more weight, perhaps I should look into simulating Todd&#8217;s approach instead.<br />
I guess this just shows the difficulty not just in defining influence, but in obtaining directly comparable figures even for popularity.<br />
So, I&#8217;m going to look into this today. I&#8217;ll reconstruct the Todd And table just to make sure I&#8217;m following the same principles, and see how that affects the table (although I can&#8217;t add the &#8216;Todd And&#8217; factor unfortunately).<br />
Thanks,<br />
FG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In the Same League&#8230;? &#171; The Spud Gun</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[In the Same League&#8230;? &#171; The Spud Gun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] June 10th, 2007   The Friendly Ghost has been compiling stats again! This time a &#8216;league table&#8217; if you like of the top 70 or so PR bloggers. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] June 10th, 2007   The Friendly Ghost has been compiling stats again! This time a &#8216;league table&#8217; if you like of the top 70 or so PR bloggers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudgun</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spudgun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can I Just point out, by way of mitigating circumstances, that the spud gun in, its current incarnation, is a mere two says old... but thanks (I think)for including us.

So we have &quot;must try harder&quot; on this terms report card.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I Just point out, by way of mitigating circumstances, that the spud gun in, its current incarnation, is a mere two says old&#8230; but thanks (I think)for including us.</p>
<p>So we have &#8220;must try harder&#8221; on this terms report card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Davies</title>
		<link>http://brendancooper.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Davies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thefriendlyghost.wordpress.com/2007/06/09/the-friendly-ghost-pr-power-index-the-top-70-or-so-pr-blogs/#comment-264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post. Way hey! I&#039;m second out of the UK bloggers. 

My Bloglines stats need bumping up too as my blog has three feeds (daft I know) - collectively my Bloglines subscribers are 235. 

P.S I received a referral from this blog post but I can&#039;t find the link to my blog from it? Weird.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. Way hey! I&#8217;m second out of the UK bloggers. </p>
<p>My Bloglines stats need bumping up too as my blog has three feeds (daft I know) &#8211; collectively my Bloglines subscribers are 235. </p>
<p>P.S I received a referral from this blog post but I can&#8217;t find the link to my blog from it? Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

